Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Linus' gang: "abandon the current GPLv3 process before it becomes too late"

[David Kastrup]

Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:

> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> > IBM didn't remain the copyright holder, but FSF just can't be
>> > exclusive licensor
>> 
>> Well, reread what Alfred wrote above.  "exclusive copyright holder".
>
> Yeah, as if copyright ownership can be non-exclusive (in the sense
> of suing strangers -- not parties to license contracts).

If you want to argue against a point that Alfred did not make, you
probably should not quote him.  At least that is what Alfred does in
similar cases.  Better still, argue against what he wrote instead of
what you want to argue against.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum