Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Linus' "Ode to GPLv2"

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> Warm and fuzzy does not work as a legally binding license.  One has to
> spell out all areas where "tit for tat" can be undermined to a fatal
> degree.

You mean the FSF's crackpot theory regarding "based on" copyright 
derivation a la "Subclassing is creating a derivative work. Therefore, 
the terms of the GPL affect the whole program where you create a 
subclass of a GPL'ed class." spelled out in moronic GPL FAQ?

regards,
alexander.