[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: German-GPL victorious in Frankfurt district court
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: German-GPL victorious in Frankfurt district court |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Sep 2006 22:12:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> >> Yup. And the only "rest" was the key for the damages.
>> >
>> > That's your interpretation. I'd have to see all filings to agree or
>> > disagree with it. If you have access and can provide this
>> > information, I'd appreciate it greatly.
>>
>> Uh, you can just read the judgment text. They state the claims.
>
> They stated a lot. I just want to be sure. A lot doesn't follow.
Suit yourself.
> For example, they acknowledged that "infringed" stuff is made
> available under the GPL and only the GPL, but somehow they came to
> conclusion that 150K in IP value (not the same as cost to develop)
> is just fine.
>
> How come?
Because that are more or less standard figures?
> [...]
>> > and it appears that the GPL just can't do any better (that was the
>> > second try in another district court): GNUtians should begin to
>> > worry. No?
>>
>> Worry? I don't see about what. This case was not about forcing
>> D-Link to comply with the GPL (they were smart enough to comply of
>
> They complied but disclaimed Rechtspflicht.
And got burnt.
>> their own accord once presented with the findings of Welte), but for
>
> But according to this district court, D-Link is still "infringer"
> and that's why they must provide information, etc. The court said
> that D-Link either retroactively lost all the rights (Pg 13, 2nd
> paragraph), or never ever had any rights whatsoever due to GPL
> invalidity (see Pg 15, right on top). It's astonishing GPL catch-22
> magic in work: the GPL licensor can't possibly lose in court.
Well, yes. That's a consequence of the GPL being a license, not a
contract. Which is why everybody and his mother prefers to settle
rather than go to court, leading to a dearth of actual court cases.
> And this district court bought it. Uh, morons.
They won't remain the last judges you choose to call morons or drunk.
That's what you say all the time.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- German-GPL victorious in Frankfurt district court, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/22
- Re: German-GPL victorious in Frankfurt district court, David Kastrup, 2006/09/22
- Re: German-GPL victorious in Frankfurt district court, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/22
- Re: German-GPL victorious in Frankfurt district court, David Kastrup, 2006/09/22
- Re: German-GPL victorious in Frankfurt district court, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/22
- Re: German-GPL victorious in Frankfurt district court, David Kastrup, 2006/09/22
- Re: German-GPL victorious in Frankfurt district court, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/22
- Re: German-GPL victorious in Frankfurt district court,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: German-GPL victorious in Frankfurt district court, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/22
- Re: German-GPL victorious in Frankfurt district court, David Kastrup, 2006/09/22
- Re: German-GPL victorious in Frankfurt district court, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/22
- Re: German-GPL victorious in Frankfurt district court, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/22
- Re: German-GPL victorious in Frankfurt district court, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/23
- Re: German-GPL victorious in Frankfurt district court, David Kastrup, 2006/09/23
- Re: German-GPL victorious in Frankfurt district court, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/23
- Re: German-GPL victorious in Frankfurt district court, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/24
Re: German-GPL victorious in Frankfurt district court, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/22