[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:10:45 +0200 (CEST) |
> The first option is the get-out-of-jail card for the
> defendant. Just like in Monopoly, you can't be forced to play
> that card.
>
> Paying damges vs. do something else that won't hurt your wallet
> is being forced in my book, you have no choice of not doing it.
You're assuming that for everyone, releasing software as GPL is
better than paying money to the copyright holder.
You are assuming that the fine will not be big.
Imagine Emacs code being copy&pasted into the Microsoft Word
sourcecode. What do you think MS would prefer, pay the fine or
release Word under GPL?
Depends on the fine.
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/21
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/21
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/21
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/21
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/21
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/21
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/22
- Re: GNU licenses,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/22
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/22
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/21
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/21
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/21
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/21
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/22
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/20
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/20
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05