[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Sep 2006 11:39:37 +0200 |
Lasse Reichstein Nielsen wrote:
[...]
> will not be allowed to distribute the work without breaking copyright law
> (which you are bound by, whether you accept it or not).
17 USC 109, stupid. Read it. And try to spell come "conditions" to
make a copy under the GPL. And once a copy is lawfully made... read
17 USC 109, idiot.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/21
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/21
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/21
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/21
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/22
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/20
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05