[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:23:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > 8/28 IBM filed "supplimental authorities."
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > These appellate judges are no morons
>>
>> Remember that line. You'll be singing a different tune once they
>> finish the case.
>
> I can't exclude that possibility entirely. Depends on their
> reasoning. No morons can become morons, y'know. And the GPL has
> amazing power to induce moronity, I admit.
Seeing what it has done to you, I tend to agree.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/14
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, David Kastrup, 2006/09/14
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/14
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/14
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, David Kastrup, 2006/09/14
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/14
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, David Kastrup, 2006/09/14
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/14