[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:09:14 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > 8/28 IBM filed "supplimental authorities."
>
> [...]
>
> > These appellate judges are no morons
>
> Remember that line. You'll be singing a different tune once they
> finish the case.
I can't exclude that possibility entirely. Depends on their reasoning.
No morons can become morons, y'know. And the GPL has amazing power to
induce moronity, I admit.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/14
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, David Kastrup, 2006/09/14
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, David Kastrup, 2006/09/14
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/14
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, David Kastrup, 2006/09/14
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/14
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, David Kastrup, 2006/09/14
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/14