[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question reguarding GNU FDL license
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Question reguarding GNU FDL license |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:59:24 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> In mine, the GPL reads:
>
> (clause 1)
>
> You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy,
> and you may at your option offer warranty protection in exchange
> for a fee.
That's not about copying, stupid. It's about a "physical act of
transferring a copy" and "warranty protection."
>
> What you are referring to is:
>
> 2b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in
> whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any
> part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third
> parties under the terms of this License.
>
> The "no charge" clause is for _licensing_,
And licensing to do what? Idiot.
regards,
alexander,
- Question reguarding GNU FDL license, me, 2006/09/13
- Message not available
- Re: Question reguarding GNU FDL license, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/13
- Re: Question reguarding GNU FDL license, Richard Tobin, 2006/09/13
- Re: Question reguarding GNU FDL license, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/13
- Re: Question reguarding GNU FDL license, Richard Tobin, 2006/09/13
- Re: Question reguarding GNU FDL license, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/14
- Re: Question reguarding GNU FDL license, David Kastrup, 2006/09/14
- Re: Question reguarding GNU FDL license, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/14