[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Sep 2006 18:40:50 +0200 |
Richard Tobin wrote:
>
> In article <44FF3779.C9F8F90@web.de>,
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
>
> > buyer's cost to obtain = 0 (per GPL "no charge" provision)
> >
> > seller's cost to create = programmer's salary, energy, etc.
> >
> >So where is a profit, dak?
Profit = buyer's cost to obtain - seller's cost to create
>
> There seems to be a substantial profit for the "buyer" here: they get
> a program for nothing.
I was talking about a profit for seller (creator of GPL derivative
work), not commercial value of seller's created derivative work for
buyer minus buyer's cost to obtain.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, Richard Tobin, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GNU licenses, Richard Tobin, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/08