[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
Richard Tobin |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
7 Sep 2006 16:13:03 GMT |
In article <44FF3779.C9F8F90@web.de>,
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
> buyer's cost to obtain = 0 (per GPL "no charge" provision)
>
> seller's cost to create = programmer's salary, energy, etc.
>
>So where is a profit, dak?
There seems to be a substantial profit for the "buyer" here: they get
a program for nothing.
-- Richard
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses,
Richard Tobin <=
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Richard Tobin, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/08