[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:38:35 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> And another irrelevant link, congratulations. What the concrete
> Google financials have to do with what to expect in the wake of an IPO
> will probably remain your secret.
Google also had an IPO, stupid.
>
> If it has not escaped you,
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/4950
------
If you have the stomach for reading financial reports, Red Hat's IPO
prospectus (or S-1 filing) is a page-turning descent into the code-
eat-code world of operating systems and computing competition. Because
there can be no secrets in SEC filings--at least no secrets disgruntled
investors could later point to as examples of fraud or deceit--
companies are often brutally honest when appraising their own
prospects. For example, under the heading "Risks Related to the Open
Source Business Model," the Red Hat S-1 announces in full caps: "OUR
SOFTWARE CONSISTS LARGELY OF CODE DEVELOPED BY INDEPENDENT THIRD
PARTIES WHICH MAKES IT DIFFICULT TO ASSEMBLE AND TEST," and "WE EXPECT
TO INCUR SUBSTANTIAL LOSSES IN THE FUTURE," and my particular favorite,
"OUR ABILITY TO GENERATE REVENUE FROM SALES MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED
IF USERS CAN QUICKLY DOWNLOAD RED HAT LINUX FROM THE INTERNET."
------
Actually, according to S-1, they originally planned to make living by
transforming to major Linux Web Portal hoping to attract lots of
advertising and site sponsors.
Like Google. :-)
http://news.com.com/2100-1001-251961.html
Now,
------
Good riddance to the portal play
But there have been some changes since the go-go technology days of
1999, when Red Hat went public. The company's IPO prospectus spoke
extensively of Red Hat's Web traffic, advertising revenue, and
plans to be a major Linux Web destination.
Now most of that has passed by the wayside. Good riddance, Young
said.
"Page views...was a metric that the investors were watching very
closely. It wasn't a metric we cared about," he said. "We were
under constant pressure to invest in things that have a lot of
page views. But management couldn't figure out where the money was."
Financial analysts pushed the Web site plans, and Red Hat
accordingly adjusted its S-1--the document filed to describe the
company's plans before the IPO. "If your S-1 is designed to sell
your stock to Janus and Fidelity, you give Janus and Fidelity what
they want to know," he said.
------
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, Richard Tobin, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Richard Tobin, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/08