[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Sep 2006 13:45:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> So you claim that they were not profitable? How then did they survive
>> and expand?
>
> IPO scam.
Well, you have to have a business before making an IPO entry. And
RedHat is still positioned pretty well on the stock market, even
though not at stock market bubble evaluation.
So it seems that the investors are still of the opinion they are
getting their money's worth.
And it would be stupid not to have net losses following an IPO: where
is the purpose in asking for money if you are not going to spend it?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, Richard Tobin, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Richard Tobin, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/08