[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Sep 2006 12:37:53 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> So you claim that they were not profitable? How then did they survive
> and expand?
IPO scam.
Red Hat abandoned retail market in mid fiscal 2004, IIRC.
Now, here's the data (in thousands, fiscal, restated):
1997: net LOSS 1318 (-)
1998: net LOSS 3738 (-)
1999: net LOSS 6388 (-)
2000: net LOSS 43053 (-)
2001: net LOSS 86773 (-)
2002: net LOSS 139949 (-)
2003: net LOSS 6734 (-)
2004: net income 13732 (+)
2005: net income 45426 (+)
2006: net income 79685 (+)
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, Richard Tobin, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Richard Tobin, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/08