[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Sep 2006 10:12:31 +0200 |
John Hasler wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov writes:
> > Man oh man. Profit = buyer's cost to obtain - seller's cost to create.
>
> The marginal cost of creating a copy of a piece of software is close enough
> to zero as makes no difference. And it is a _copy_ that the seller buys.
Seller buys nothing. Seller sells, stupid. It's about the cost of
CREATING A DERIVATIVE WORK, not making copies of it, retard.
Reproduction of copies is beside the point, because buyer "buys"
(for free) all the rights to do it himself and so it's not the
cost on the seller's side. Now, Red Hat has found a sorta workaround
for installed copies (they impose mandatory service fee), but they
admit that it's on the shaky ground.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/06
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07