[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Sep 2006 23:28:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
R> David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>>
>> > David Kastrup wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >> The GPL creates its own software pool
>> >
>> > of intellectual property price fixed below the cost of its creation.
>>
>> Well, that is what is called civilization and culture. Not having to
>> reinvent the wheel, but profiting from the knowledge created by
>> others.
>
> Man oh man. Profit = buyer's cost to obtain - seller's cost to create.
>
> Okay?
Ok.
> Now we take the case with distribution of new (we are now going to
> create) derivative work of something under the GPL:
>
> buyer's cost to obtain = 0 (per GPL "no charge" provision)
Wrong.
GPL clause 1:
You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy,
and you may at your option offer warranty protection in exchange
for a fee.
And that's what makes free software distributors turn a profit. Now
what kind of premium will a customer accept for buying from an active
author himself instead of some downstream recipient? That is the
balance point. How much can active development help to maintain at
least a temporal margin before competitors? That's another one.
Neither are set at $0. And that's because the _licensing_ does not
cost extra, but the software itself may.
> seller's cost to create = programmer's salary, energy, etc.
>
> So where is a profit, dak?
seller's cost to obtain GPLed work on which he bases his own: 0, or
competitively low (like his own selling price).
And that's what turns the scales. Yes, you have to have a good
product to make the turns tip in your favor. Or a product that
develops its full potential by qualified service and/or customization
and/or support. For which you are again a natural first source. That
does not mean artificially crippling a product: customization of
complex systems is pretty much by necessity a complex process, and an
experienced person can save a lot of work hours.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/06
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/06
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/07