[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Sep 2006 20:17:53 +0200 |
John Hasler wrote:
>
> > Well, you can also get whitebox Linux or something like that...
[Red Hat's free-riders]
>
> White Box Linux and Centos.
WBL is not well supported. Centos has more friends (Sun Microsystems
and OpenSolaris Project). At some point Red Hat will have to fire core
programmers and only packagers will stay (free-riders do not have the
overhead of patronage and can offer the same patching services). Red
Hat's only hope is certifications lockin barrier.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Richard Tobin, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05