[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Sep 2006 14:21:58 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> This is a modification of the application.
The GPL is a copyright thing, retard. Show me original literary work,
(computer program works are protected as literary works) and modified
literary work (changed expression) modulo filtering of unprotected
elements (see case law on the AFC test), and we can talk then.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/06
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/06
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/06
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/06