[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
John Hasler |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Sep 2006 18:29:44 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
> "the Web" consists of a lot of different protocols, and most people don't
> have dedicated lines for private exchanges.
The only protocols used on the Web, so far as I am aware, are HTTP and
HTTPS. And if it isn't public it isn't part of the Web.
> So please give an example for some software which you consider
> free-for-the-taking due to it being on some public server without any
> notices concerning the legal status of the software.
Hit any site that uses Javascript and you will have a lump of software
downloaded and running on your machine before you have seen any notices.
Of course, that Javascript is certainly protected by copyright, but the
copy of it on your machine is just as certainly yours.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses,
John Hasler <=
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, alexander . terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/05