[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
Richard Tobin |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
5 Sep 2006 21:06:15 GMT |
In article <1157489942.432984.112620@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
<mike4ty4@yahoo.com> wrote:
>but I don't understand the rationale
>for MAKING THE LICENSE THAT WAY, why it demands the original
>code become GNU ***and be USELESS for non-GNU projects without
>making them GNU***. It's that last part in asterisks that I hate. The
>distribution of said combined work should have NO BEARING on
>ANY other works that have NO 3rd-party code in them but are based
>on ORIGINAL code from the combined work!
The people who wrote the GNU licence wrote it to further their own
goals, which are not the same as yours. I am at a loss as to why you
think they should have written it in such as way as to help you
achieve things they don't want to support.
-- Richard
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses,
Richard Tobin <=
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/06
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/08
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/08