[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Sep 2006 15:29:59 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>
> > John Hasler wrote:
> > [...]
> >> you see fit. It is only the work consisting of a combination of
> >> your work and a GPL work that may only be distributed under the
> >> GPL.
> >
> > Sez who? See "mere aggregation" clause in the GPL, retard.
>
> The problem with your argumentation is that you think _every_
> combination of code a "mere aggregation". That is not the case,
> however, and courts as well as jurisdiction are well aware of the
> difference.
So why don't you drop a link or cite some ruling?
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Richard Tobin, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GNU licenses, Richard Tobin, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/05