[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
|
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
|
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
|
Date: |
Tue, 05 Sep 2006 15:00:52 +0200 |
John Hasler wrote:
[...]
> No. You must make the entire _derivative_ (that is, the work consisting of
> the combination of your work and the GPL work) GPL.
That's not a derivative work under copyright law according to statutory
definitions (and case law), retarded uncle Hasler.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Re: GNU licenses, Richard Tobin, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Richard Tobin, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/06
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/07