[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
|
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
|
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
|
Date: |
Tue, 05 Sep 2006 11:50:49 +0200 |
Merijn de Weerd wrote:
[...]
> This is about *legally can* versus *factually can*. I am physically able
> to distribute works without accepting their license. It is an
> infringement of the applicable copyright, sure.
Not necessarily. There is a whole bunch of exception to exclusive
rights such as 17 USC 109 and 117.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/04
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/03