[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
John Hasler |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:17:32 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
mike4ty4 writes:
> That does NOT make sense, he seems to be implying that linking together
> GNU libraries is forbidden! Even if everything used in the project is all
> GNU and the end product is released as GNU! Is this right?!
No. He is saying no such thing.
> So then he wants to keep it MUDDY so that people can get headaches
> over it, make misconceptions, and fall all over the place.
The GPL is very clear. Furthermore, Richard's interpretations are just his
opinion. The GPL is a model license, not a law and the FSF is a private
organization with no legal authority.
As to Terkhov, ignore him. He's just an inept troll.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, alexander . terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, alexander . terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses,
John Hasler <=
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/04
Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04