[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
Stefaan A Eeckels |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Sep 2006 02:31:51 +0200 |
On 4 Sep 2006 15:28:33 -0700
alexander.terekhov@gmail.com wrote:
> Stefaan A Eeckels wrote:
> [...]
> > The GPL vision of software is more like how science is practiced
>
> Rather funny practice in the context of the GPL you're talking about.
>
> Most researches with the focus on industrial application (i.e.
> something that can be used to make products right now or pretty soon;
> and I mean most researchers in both private and "public" sector) file
> for patents like crazy. And research papers and reports are mostly
> all rights reserved.
Not that kind of applied crap - I mean fundamental research, like
mathematics.
--
Stefaan A Eeckels
--
Microsoft treats IT managers the way Proctor & Gamble treats
nine-year-old prospective consumers: lots of noise, bright colors, and
jumping around. Other software vendors just wish they could be so
successful. -- Cameron Laird in comp.lang.tcl
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, alexander . terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses,
Stefaan A Eeckels <=
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
Re: GNU licenses, Wei Mingzhi, 2006/09/02
Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/02