[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
mike4ty4 |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
4 Sep 2006 12:33:58 -0700 |
User-agent: |
G2/0.2 |
David Kastrup wrote:
> mike4ty4@yahoo.com writes:
>
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> >> mike4ty4@yahoo.com writes:
> >
> >> > Which raises another question: What happens if I learn something
> >> > from the GNU software, like a "trick" or a more efficient way of
> >> > programming some algorithm? If I use that METHOD/KNOWLEDGE even
> >> > if not the ORIGINAL CODE does this mean I have to GNU?
> >>
> >> Copyright concerns a particular expression, not the idea behind it.
> >> Restricting access to ideas is the area of patents, not copyright.
> >>
> >> In order to be sure that no copyrightable expression from a good
> >> idea remains, large companies employ a "cleanroom" tactic: one team
> >> analyses the copyrighted code, and then writes a specification for
> >> it. A different team without access to the original code then
> >> rewrites the code from specification. If the whole is done in a
> >> well-documented way, it is likely to hold up in court.
> >
> > And what about an individual, not a multi-employee big fat
> > corporation?
>
> Then you are not overly likely to be on the radar for high-profile
> lawsuits. Be sure that your code is structured significantly
> different. Making an abstract interface description will help your
> case, too. Try working from that description instead of your memory
> of the code.
>
> Note that this is nothing particular to the GPL.
>
Well I guess so.
> >> Well, so why do you want to make money off the work of others
> >> without recompensating them? You are free to write to the
> >> copyright holders of the GPLed software and negotiate a different
> >> license, and pay for that privilege.
> >>
> >
> > Of course it's totally up them (the owner) whether or not I have to
> > pay for that privilege.
>
> Sure. As it is totally up to you whether or not others have to pay
> for the privilege of using your code.
>
Yep. I _need_ the money, for example.
> > Also, since I'd be starting from very little money, would they let
> > me pay for it over time using the income I get from the program?
>
> No way to find out but ask them.
>
Yep.
> > Just out of curiosity, if you made a GPL program and I wanted to use
> > a bit of code in a for-profit program (I'm not a big company
> > though), would you want me to pay money up front or could I pay it
> > off with the income I get?
>
> Very much depends on the case at hand. If I feel you are dealing with
> a fringe market, I might make it a one-time payment. If I feel that
> there is something sustainable in it, I might try for a profit ratio.
> If I find the project to be distasteful, I might refuse altogether.
> Or I might make a deal for dual-licensing (Trolltech publishes Qt
> under multiple licenses, GPL and proprietary, and the latter makes
> their income).
>
So what if I don't have enough for the "one-time" payment (would
it be like $1000 or more (!)), and thus the program has to go out to
get the money?
> --
> David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
Re: GNU licenses, Wei Mingzhi, 2006/09/02
Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/02
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses,
mike4ty4 <=
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, alexander . terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, alexander . terekhov, 2006/09/04
Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/04
Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/04
Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/04
Re: GNU licenses, alexander . terekhov, 2006/09/04