Re: GNU licenses

[David Kastrup]

mike4ty4@yahoo.com writes:

> Stefaan A Eeckels wrote:
>
>> _None_ of your original work is _ever_ "taken over" by a GPLed
>> work.  But neither can you "take over" a GPLed work and use it for
>> your own purposes without heeding the wishes of its author.
>
> Thanks for your input, but _WHY_ was the GPL originally made this
> way?  *What is the rationale* for having the person GPL the combined
> work as part of the terms, which includes all the original content?

It has been explained to you several times by different people, and
you have been given web pages to read more about it.

Instead of repeating the same question over and over, please explin
what you don't understand about the answers and links already provided
to you.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum