[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Sep 2006 19:01:04 +0200 |
John Hasler wrote:
[...]
> with no access controls. Clearly, publishing something on the Web grants
> an implicit license to the public to make those copies necessary to view
> it: that's the whole point of the Web.
It's called implied license to begin with, uncle Hasler. And there's
noting particularly interesting (for general public) to view in publicly
available GPL'd *binaries* offered for unrestricted downloads all over the
net. The implied license in this case (for those binaries) is to lawfully
make as much copies as one wants to (without performing download multiple
times for the same binary -- it's an implied license to save bandwidth).
And all those copies empower their owners with rights under 17 USC 109 and
117. Horror, horror.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, alexander . terekhov, 2006/09/04