[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
Stefaan A Eeckels |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Sep 2006 15:32:59 +0200 |
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:22:18 +0200
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
> Stefaan A Eeckels <hoendech@ecc.lu> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:52:55 +0200
> > Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
> >
> >> Sez who? Copying (and distribution) under 17 USC 117 (together
> >> with 109), for example, doesn't require a license, stupid.
> >
> > Has your teacher failed to tell you that calling people names lends
> > no credence to your arguments? As a matter of fact, it removes what
> > little credibility you might have left.
>
> So what? It makes it easier for occasional visitors to determine who
> is not to be taken seriously.
You've got a point there.
--
Stefaan A Eeckels
--
Sometimes I wonder whether the world is run by smart people who are
putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it. --Mark Twain
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses,
Stefaan A Eeckels <=
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05