[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:45:19 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> So what? It makes it easier for occasional visitors to determine who
> is not to be taken seriously.
Hey GNU-Rechtswissenschaftler dak, if you think that anyone with a non-
damaged brain (and minimum abilities for net legal research) could
possibly take YOU seriously, you're much more severe clinical case
than I thought before.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/04
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/04