[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:52:55 +0200 |
"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote:
>
> If I copy a GPL-licensed work and utterly ignore whatever the GPL
> says, how is a statement *in the GPL* going to change my legal
> position?
>
> By copying the program, you accepted the license.
Sez who? Copying (and distribution) under 17 USC 117 (together with
109), for example, doesn't require a license, stupid.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/04
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/03