[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Sep 2006 13:19:19 +0200 (CEST) |
> Breach of a copyright license is copyright infringement.
Doing an act *which is not licensed* is copyright infringement. If
I authorize you to copy my work verbatim, and you change it, you
infringe my copyright.
Doing a licensed act but failing to comply with conditions is
*breach of contract* If I authorize you to copy in return for
payment of $1 per copy, and you don't pay, you are in breach of the
license. Yet I can only sue you for non-performance and demand the
dollar per copy.
The act of `not paying $1 per copy' wasn't licensed, so this is
copyright infringement (even according to your own words).
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/04
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: GNU licenses, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05