[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Sep 2006 09:43:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
mike4ty4@yahoo.com writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>> mike4ty4@yahoo.com writes:
>>
>> > Wei Mingzhi wrote:
>> >> If you don't allow me using your code, then I don't allow you
>> >> using our code too. That's just fair.
>> >
>> > I don't know. To me it seems like a way to slowly strip owners of
>> > their rights to their original works.
>>
>> There is nothing "slow" involved here. If you use any
>> copyrightable part of GPL licensed software without negotiating a
>> different license, you are bound by the full GPL. As with any
>> other license.
>>
>
> As more code becomes GPL then the amount of non-GPL code shrinks,
Code does not shrink. GPLed code does not take independent code over.
It just has its own growth laws.
> and since the agreement requires one to make all original works
> containing GPL code GPL, it goes up fast. Of course it depends on
> how many people use the GPL code, though.
Not really. It depends on how many people _extend_ the GPLed code,
and then it also depends on how many of such changes actually get
merged in a common code base.
>> > Your code is your ORIGINAL WORK, and I don't see why I have to
>> > have you make it free to me.
>>
>> You are free to license your _own_ software under any license you
>> want, including giving them into the Public Domain.
>>
>
> But *why* do you (or whoever came up with this GNU thing or
> whatever) want to tell people to do things with _their_ code if they
> use _your_ (GNU) code?
Because it is fair. You want to make use of my code, I want to make
use of yours. We both profit.
> I know I can, and that's why I don't like GNU, because using the GNU
> code "forces" you "automatically" (note the quotes -- if you defy
> the "force", ie. the terms, you are breaking the law, it's your
> choice to use the code so it's not automatic in the sense you might
> think I'm using) to make your originals that use it GNU. I just
> don't understand why it's made that way!
Because that profits everybody in the same way.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/03
- Re: GNU licenses,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/05