[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;) |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:30:34 +0100 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> You really should be more careful with dishing out insults. It makes
> yourself look even more ridiculous.
One doesn't need a license to create and use private derivative
works (adaptations) of GPL'd software. 17 USC 117. So what is
your (and your fellow comrade GNUtian ams) point?
"The conversion of a program from one higher-level language to
another to facilitate use would fall within this right, as
would the right to add features to the program that were not
present at the time of rightful acquisition. These rights would
necessarily be more private in nature than the right to load a
program by copying it and could only be exercised so long as
they did not harm the interests of the copyright proprietor.
Unlike the exact copies authorized as described above, this
right of adaptation could not be conveyed to others along with
the licensed or owned program without the express authorization
of the owner of the copyright in the original work. "
-- http://digital-law-online.info/CONTU/contu6.html
regards,
alexander.
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), (continued)
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Merijn de Weerd, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/27
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/03/27
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alan Mackenzie, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/03/24
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/03/25
- Message not available
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;),
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/03/25
- Message not available
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/03/25
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), John Hasler, 2006/03/27
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/03/27
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Graham Murray, 2006/03/26