[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
From: |
JEDIDIAH |
Subject: |
Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:29:47 -0600 |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Debian) |
On 2006-03-10, billwg <billw@twcf.rr.com> wrote:
>
> "Kelsey Bjarnason" <kbjarnason@gmail.com> wrote in message
> pan.2006.03.09.23.10.56.12499@gmail.com">news:pan.2006.03.09.23.10.56.12499@gmail.com...
>> On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 19:31:15 +0000, billwg wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Kelsey Bjarnason" <kbjarnason@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> pan.2006.03.09.18.28.05.586986@gmail.com">news:pan.2006.03.09.18.28.05.586986@gmail.com...
>>>>
>>>> That's nice. I'm forced to conclude you can't actually support your
>>>> statement, in light of a concrete counter example, so you're
>>>> admitting
>>>> you
>>>> were, in fact, spewing complete crap.
>>>>
>>> Well you didn't read far enough, kelsey. You missed the part where
>>
>> Where you actually demonstrated how XP is faster, cheaper, more
>> reliable,
>> more flexible, more powerful than Debian, the failure of which would
>> be
>> the admission your assertion about commercial software having to be
>> better
>> was complete bullshit?
>>
>> You're right; I did miss that part. It wasn't there.
>>
>> Do feel free to point it out, though.
>>
> Well, kelsey, you are obviously hopeless, but consider that the
> consumers don't see it that way. They see linux as a cheapo substitute
Oh pulleeeze.
They don't even percieve Linux.
[deletia]
OTOH, DELL will gladly sell you a beefed up PC running Linux
and 60K per cpu server software. They will even stake their own
reputation on it.
Much like a Diesel F-350, Linux is a workhorse system that
the average consumer likely has no appreciation. Even if it is an
Eddie Bauer variant.
--
If you think that an 80G disk can hold HUNDRENDS of |||
hours of DV video then you obviously haven't used iMovie either. / | \
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, (continued)
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, chrisv, 2006/03/09
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, Kelsey Bjarnason, 2006/03/09
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, billwg, 2006/03/09
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, chrisv, 2006/03/10
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, billwg, 2006/03/10
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, chrisv, 2006/03/10
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, Kelsey Bjarnason, 2006/03/09
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, billwg, 2006/03/09
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, chrisv, 2006/03/10
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, Kelsey Bjarnason, 2006/03/10
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine,
JEDIDIAH <=
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, Jamie Hart, 2006/03/10
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, Mathew P., 2006/03/09
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, billwg, 2006/03/09
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, Rick, 2006/03/07
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/03/09
- Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine, karl, 2006/03/21