[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code
From: |
Barry Margolin |
Subject: |
Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jun 2004 14:05:49 -0400 |
User-agent: |
MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Mac OS X) |
In article <m3hdtciw8g.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>,
prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) wrote:
> Chris Jefferson <caj@cs.york.ac.uk> wrote:
> > However they do not have to make it clear in the normal execution of
> > the binary that they have made any changes. This is in my opinion
> > unacceptable if it's true.
>
> If your program is interactive, then wherever your original version
> emits a copyright notice, any modified versions are required to emit
> their own copyright notices, according to section 2c. (I think;
> IANAL.)
His concern is that this copyright notice is not required to say that
the program has been modified from the original author's version. That
requirement is only on the modified files themselves, in section 2a.
--
Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, (continued)
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Per Abrahamsen, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Tim Smith, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Chris Jefferson, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Barry Margolin, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Paul Jarc, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code,
Barry Margolin <=
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Paul Jarc, 2004/06/29
Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Snuffelluffogus, 2004/06/29