[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jun 2004 23:38:39 +0200 |
Brian Gough wrote:
[...]
> the GPL is well tested
By whom (and which interpretation)?
Attempts to extend the scope of share-alike reciprocation provision
to the entire compilations (including some other preexisting and
therefore necessarily nonderivative works) constitute misuse of the
copyright. Feel free to license any rights that the statute would
otherwise have reserved to you by default, but remember that there's
NO exclusive right to prepare collective works and that the first
sale doctrine applies to each and every lawful copy.
regards,
alexander.
Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, David Kastrup, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, David Kastrup, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, David Kastrup, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, David Kastrup, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/06/29