[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code
From: |
Paul Jarc |
Subject: |
Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:09:13 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Chris Jefferson <caj@cs.york.ac.uk> wrote:
> However they do not have to make it clear in the normal execution of
> the binary that they have made any changes. This is in my opinion
> unacceptable if it's true.
If your program is interactive, then wherever your original version
emits a copyright notice, any modified versions are required to emit
their own copyright notices, according to section 2c. (I think;
IANAL.)
paul
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, (continued)
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Byron A Jeff, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Per Abrahamsen, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Tim Smith, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Chris Jefferson, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Barry Margolin, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code,
Paul Jarc <=
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Barry Margolin, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Paul Jarc, 2004/06/29
Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Snuffelluffogus, 2004/06/29