[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent)
From: |
Alun |
Subject: |
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent) |
Date: |
30 Apr 2004 00:31:37 GMT |
User-agent: |
Xnews/4.11.09 |
Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote in news:barmar-
D04B9F.20015429042004@comcast.ash.giganews.com:
> In article <uk6zyo3lu.fsf@news.dtpq.com>,
> cstacy@news.dtpq.com (Christopher C. Stacy) wrote:
>
>> Once fully granted, is it possible for a patent like the one above
>> to be somehow overturned? (If this is even possible, I am sure that
>> it costs big bucks.)
>
> I think there's a relatively inexpensive way to request that the PTO
> review a patent. The expensive way to challenge a patent is to wait to
> be sued for patent infringement, and go to court to defend yourself.
>
It is indeed cheaper to file a reexamination than to wait to be sued. In
the past all reexaminations were ex parte, meaning that you filed it and
then couldn't participate, which was not ideal. It is now possible to
choose an inter partes reexamination, in which you can take part. No one
much has taken advantage of this new procedure (if anyone?). I would find
it an interesting experience, or perhaps even experiment is a better word?
Alun Palmer, US Patent Agent
- 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), theodp, 2004/04/27
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Harlan Messinger, 2004/04/27
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Jim Richardson, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), John W. Eaton, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Tim Jackson, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Rahul Dhesi, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Tim Jackson, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Christopher C. Stacy, 2004/04/29
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/29
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent),
Alun <=
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Rahul Dhesi, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Rahul Dhesi, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Rahul Dhesi, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Ben Pfaff, 2004/04/29
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/29
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Rahul Dhesi, 2004/04/29
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/29
- Prev by Date:
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent)
- Next by Date:
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent)
- Previous by thread:
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent)
- Next by thread:
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent)
- Index(es):