[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent)
From: |
Rahul Dhesi |
Subject: |
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent) |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Apr 2004 19:34:07 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
nn/6.6.4 |
Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> writes:
>In article <878ygelmtd.fsf@blp.benpfaff.org>,
> Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
>> Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> writes:
>>
>> > In article <c6piil$tj1$1@blue.rahul.net>,
>> > c.c.eiftj@1-ClickXXS.usenet.us.com (Rahul Dhesi) wrote:
>> >
>> >> Most Microsoft users use "open" to mean "whatever happens after I click".
>> >
>> > I doubt anyone thinks that when they click on a link in a browser and it
>> > goes to another page or submits a form that this is "launching an
>> > application".
>>
>> Are web-based email services applications?
>Possibly. But the individual operations within the email service aren't.
>BTW, rather than harping on the phrase "open the application", I'm more
>concerned about "limited resource computing device"....
I'm concerned about both. These are all very vague terms with
potentially unlimited domains of use -- the sort of terms that are ideal
for use in defining the claims in a patent.
But unlike me, you seemd to imply, several times, that "open" and
"application" had obvious common meanings -- which meanings you have yet
to state with any prevision.
--
Rahul
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), (continued)
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/29
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Alun, 2004/04/29
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Rahul Dhesi, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Rahul Dhesi, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Rahul Dhesi, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Ben Pfaff, 2004/04/29
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/29
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent),
Rahul Dhesi <=
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/29
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Rahul Dhesi, 2004/04/29
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Christopher C. Stacy, 2004/04/29
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/29
Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Barry Margolin, 2004/04/27
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Matt, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), Philip Callan, 2004/04/28
- Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), John W. Eaton, 2004/04/28
1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent), derelict, 2004/04/27