|
From: | John W. Eaton |
Subject: | Re: 1-Click, Short-Click, Long-Click, More-Clicks (New Microsoft Patent) |
Date: | 28 Apr 2004 13:46:00 -0500 |
Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> writes: > The patent is very specific that it *only* applies to using the click > timing to vary the way an application is opened. It says nothing about > alternate actions within an application, nor about shutting down an > application or computer. But shouldn't a patent application that only introduces some minor incremental difference from some previous technology (i.e., the broader sense of what action is performed based on the timings of the button pushes, or whether the button is physical or simulated on a computer screen, etc.) be rejected anyway, based on the idea that they would be obvious to competent practitioners in the field? jwe -- www.octave.org | www.che.wisc.edu/~jwe | Peace would shock and awe me.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |