Re: Status of FORWARD

[Michael Riedl]

John,

thanks for pointing to that - in my view having FORWARD declarations 
would be appreciated to ensure portability - but also no "must have".

Gruß

Michael

Am 31.05.24 um 23:25 schrieb john o goyo:
> Greetings, Gaius.
>
> There was talk of doing something with FORWARD in 2015 
> (https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gm2/2015-07/msg00019.html).  I 
> assume nothing was done because the gm2-14.1.0 documentation is silent 
> on the matter.
>
> I am not asking for it -- I am simply curious as to your thoughts. 
> (This came about looking at the ETHZ single-pass compiler, which is 
> peppered with FORWARD.)
>
> Sincerely,
> john