Re: Questions about behavior observed in gm2 [Funcation procedure calls]

[john o goyo]

On 2023-12-04 03:33, Gaius Mulley wrote (in part):
> Jack Perry <devotus@yahoo.com> writes(in part):
[...]
> > 3. If you neglect the parentheses on a function procedure that takes no 
> > parameters, gm2 treats it as if you want the address(?). Thus, the following 
> > line gives an unexpected answer:
> >
> >        InOut.WriteInt(Part1, 0); (* needs to be Part1() *)
> Interesting - and thanks for the bug report - I'll investigate the above
> two issues

Why is this a bug?  I looked at ISO 1054-1 but being conversant with the 
VDM used, I came away no wiser. However, the Lilith source has hundreds 
of invocations of function procedures with trailing empty parentheses.

Sincerely,
john