[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gm2] translating C bit fields
From: |
Dragiša Durić |
Subject: |
Re: [Gm2] translating C bit fields |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Nov 2011 22:05:06 +0100 |
Hi Gaius,
It looks good.I suppose we can also use this to put "ordinary" fields "out of"
standard alignment ?
RECORD
a: BOOLEAN BY 8;
b: CARDINAL MOD 0 BY 32?
END;
Or..?
dd
On Nov 23, 2011, at 3:29 PM, Gaius Mulley wrote:
> Dragiša Durić <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Gaius,
>>
>> IMO - we also need a mechanism to fix a sequence of fields to word boundary.
>> Obviousy, a field without "BY" will fit to its default alignment position,
>> but
>> what if we have
>>
>> type = RECORD
>> foo: INTEGER BY 2;
>> bar: CARDINAL BY 4;
>> butalso: CARDINAL BY 2; (* and we need to have this aligned to some
>> boundary…
>> *)
>> END;
>>
>> Alignment can be pretty complicated these days when on same architecture some
>> people decide to align 64 bit values to byte positions divisible by 8… And
>> other do not. I met such a situation while wrapping Gtk2 to Modula-3… gcc
>> aligns such values to divisible-by-4 byte positions, while cm3 aligns to
>> divisible-by-8…
>
> Hi Dragiša,
>
> ok - how about:
>
> type = RECORD
> foo: INTEGER BY 2;
> bar: CARDINAL BY 4;
> butalso: CARDINAL MOD 4 BY 2; (* and we need to have this aligned to some
> boundary *)
> END;
>
> so we extend the ebnf to include:
>
> FieldAlignment := [ ByteAlignment | BitAlignment ] =:
>
> BitAlignment := [ 'MOD' ConstExpression ] 'BY' ConstExpression =:
>
> ByteAlignment := "__ATTRIBUTE__" "(" "(" Ident "(" ConstExpression ")" ")" ")"
> =:
>
> where the MOD indicates the byte alignment and BY indicates the bit
> length? MOD 0 indicates packed, MOD 1 the next byte.
>
> regards,
> Gaius
- [Gm2] translating C bit fields, SiTex Graphics, 2011/11/16
- Re: [Gm2] translating C bit fields, Gaius Mulley, 2011/11/19
- Re: [Gm2] translating C bit fields, SiTex Graphics, 2011/11/21
- Re: [Gm2] translating C bit fields, Gaius Mulley, 2011/11/23
- Re: [Gm2] translating C bit fields, Dragiša Durić, 2011/11/23
- Re: [Gm2] translating C bit fields, Gaius Mulley, 2011/11/23
- Re: [Gm2] translating C bit fields,
Dragiša Durić <=
- Re: [Gm2] translating C bit fields, SiTex Graphics, 2011/11/23
- Re: [Gm2] translating C bit fields, Dragiša Durić, 2011/11/23
- Re: [Gm2] translating C bit fields, Fischlin Andreas, 2011/11/24
- Re: [Gm2] translating C bit fields, Gaius Mulley, 2011/11/23