[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17
From: |
SiTex Graphics |
Subject: |
Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17 |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:24:32 -0700 |
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Gaius Mulley <address@hidden> wrote:
> I could be wrong - but did you forget to compile it (the above is just
> a link). Your code appears to work on my machine..
Argh! Yes, I forgot to re-compile.
With that fix and a few other tweaks to the code, the test application
now appears to be working properly in all of my tests (so far), which
is fantastic! There are a few features I haven't hooked up yet
because they require interfacing to some system libraries. Will let
you know how that goes.
Thanks again for all your help.
-Scott
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, (continued)
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, Gaius Mulley, 2009/10/09
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, SiTex Graphics, 2009/10/09
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, SiTex Graphics, 2009/10/09
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, SiTex Graphics, 2009/10/09
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, Gaius Mulley, 2009/10/10
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, Gaius Mulley, 2009/10/14
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, SiTex Graphics, 2009/10/14
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, Gaius Mulley, 2009/10/15
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, SiTex Graphics, 2009/10/16
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, Gaius Mulley, 2009/10/16
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17,
SiTex Graphics <=
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, Iztok Kobal, 2009/10/12
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, SiTex Graphics, 2009/10/14