[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17
From: |
Gaius Mulley |
Subject: |
Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17 |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:45:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
SiTex Graphics <address@hidden> writes:
> In the course of getting the application to work, I coded around what
> seems to be a bug in the conversion of record fields that are small
> cardinals or integers. The short test module below illustrates the
> bug. Compiled with
>
> gm2 -I. -fiso -fmakeall -o test test.mod
>
> The result is:
>
> in = 1718
> out = 12977846
>
> I expect the compiler either to issue a type incompatibility error or
> to produce the correct result. Note that either removing the in2
> field or setting that field to 0 produces a correct result. Maybe that
> will help track this one down.
>
> This situation crops up quite a bit in the test application, and I
> think this bug is likely causing at least some of the runtime
> failures.
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
>
>
> MODULE test;
>
> FROM SYSTEM IMPORT CARDINAL16;
> IMPORT STextIO, SWholeIO;
>
> TYPE
> InOut = RECORD
> in : CARDINAL16;
> in2 : CARDINAL16; (* remove this and it works?! *)
> out : CARDINAL;
> END;
>
> VAR
> io : InOut;
>
> BEGIN
> io.in:=1718;
> io.in2:=198; (* or set in2 to 0 and it works *)
>
> io.out:=io.in;
>
> STextIO.WriteString("in = ");
> SWholeIO.WriteCard(VAL(CARDINAL,io.in),1);
> STextIO.WriteLn;
>
> STextIO.WriteString("out = ");
> SWholeIO.WriteCard(io.out,1);
> STextIO.WriteLn;
> END test.
Hi Scott,
now fixed in the latest cvs..
regards,
Gaius
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, SiTex Graphics, 2009/10/05
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, Gaius Mulley, 2009/10/06
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, SiTex Graphics, 2009/10/08
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, Gaius Mulley, 2009/10/09
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, SiTex Graphics, 2009/10/09
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, SiTex Graphics, 2009/10/09
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, SiTex Graphics, 2009/10/09
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, Gaius Mulley, 2009/10/10
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, Gaius Mulley, 2009/10/14
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, SiTex Graphics, 2009/10/14
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17,
Gaius Mulley <=
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, SiTex Graphics, 2009/10/16
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, Gaius Mulley, 2009/10/16
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, SiTex Graphics, 2009/10/19
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, Iztok Kobal, 2009/10/12
- Re: [Gm2] Follow up for bugs reported June 17, SiTex Graphics, 2009/10/14