[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Gm2] equality, inequality tests and structured types
From: |
Breeden, Thomas (tmb) |
Subject: |
RE: [Gm2] equality, inequality tests and structured types |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:56:53 -0500 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Fischlin [mailto:address@hidden
>
> We need to keep these issues separate, i.e. equality and inequality
> tests and coercability between pointers (ADDRESS) and variables of an
> opaque type. Therefore:
> ...
>
>
> IF x1 <> x2 THEN
>
> has not necessary anything to do with assignment compatibility. A
> construct like
>
> undefMyOpaque: MyOpaque; (read-only)
>
> can serve to overcome this NIL incompatibility
Ah yes. I have gotten so unaccustomed to putting variables in the Definition
module,
I have been doing this with a function call like IOChan.InvalidChan() to be
safe.
Tom
address@hidden
- [Gm2] equality, inequality tests and structured types, Gaius Mulley, 2009/01/14
- Re: [Gm2] equality, inequality tests and structured types, Andreas Fischlin, 2009/01/16
- Re: [Gm2] equality, inequality tests and structured types, Gaius Mulley, 2009/01/17
- Re: [Gm2] equality, inequality tests and structured types, Andreas Fischlin, 2009/01/18
- Re: [Gm2] equality, inequality tests and structured types, Gaius Mulley, 2009/01/18
- RE: [Gm2] equality, inequality tests and structured types, Breeden, Thomas (tmb), 2009/01/25
- Re: [Gm2] equality, inequality tests and structured types, Gaius Mulley, 2009/01/27
- Re: [Gm2] equality, inequality tests and structured types, Andreas Fischlin, 2009/01/27
- RE: [Gm2] equality, inequality tests and structured types,
Breeden, Thomas (tmb) <=
- RE: [Gm2] equality, inequality tests and structured types, Breeden, Thomas (tmb), 2009/01/28
- Re: [Gm2] equality, inequality tests and structured types, Gaius Mulley, 2009/01/29
- Re: [Gm2] equality, inequality tests and structured types, Andreas Fischlin, 2009/01/27