[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gm2] Re: Building under Solaris 9 on Sparc -- update 2 (mostly bad)
From: |
Gaius Mulley |
Subject: |
[Gm2] Re: Building under Solaris 9 on Sparc -- update 2 (mostly bad) |
Date: |
09 Jun 2005 23:19:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
john o goyo <address@hidden> writes:
Hi John,
I've fixed a number of bugs to do with -Wextended-opaque and have just
uploaded the CVS changes. Hopefully, these problems below should now
be solved..
Any chance you can test on your various platforms?
Thanks Gaius
> Unfortunately, now both the 32- and 64-bit version fail under the
> latest CVS version (of 2005-06-07). It even fails on my Intel-based
> Linux box. (Sigh)
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 1. Solaris-i32lp64 FAILED:
>
> ../../gcc-3.3.3-gm2/gcc/gm2/ulm-lib-gm2/std/Plot.mod:0: internal
> compiler error: Segmentation Fault
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 2. Solaris-ilp32 FAILED:
>
> First the compiler failed to find the constant CreateMode in StdIO.mod in
> the ulm library. I moved the definition of the constant to outside the
> procedure.
>
> ./xgm2 -Wnil -Wcase -Wbounds -Wreturn -g -gdwarf-2 -funbounded-by-reference
> -Wverbose-unbounded -Wpim -Wpedantic-param-names -Wextended-opaque -c
> -B./stage1/gm2
> -I../../gcc-3.3.2-gm2/gcc/gm2/ulm-lib-gm2/std:../../gcc-3.3.2-gm2/gcc/gm2/ulm-lib-gm2/sys:../../gcc-3.3.2-gm2/gcc/gm2/gm2-libs
> ../../gcc-3.3.3-gm2/gcc/gm2/ulm-lib-gm2/std/StdFuncs.mod
> -o gm2/ulm-lib-gm2/std/StdFuncs.o
> ../../gcc-3.3.3-gm2/gcc/gm2/gm2-compiler/SymbolKey.mod:241:parameter t
> should never be NIL
> gmake[1]: *** [gm2/ulm-lib-gm2/std/StdFuncs.o] Error 1
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 3. Linux-Intel FAILED:
>
> The same error with the constant CreateMode as in Solaris-ilp32. (Consistency
> is good. #6-) I modified StdIO.mod as above and was rewarded with the
> same failure as above.
....
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> For the record, I configure anew each time that I build.
>
> Sincerely,
> john