gforth
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Gforth Digest, Vol 110, Issue 2


From: Patrick Fitzpatrick
Subject: Re: Gforth Digest, Vol 110, Issue 2
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 14:11:49 -0500

I personally would like to thank Anton and Bernd for Gforth and thank all
of the contributors.

Thank you all.

Best wishes,
Fitz


On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 11:06 AM <gforth-request@gnu.org> wrote:

> Send Gforth mailing list submissions to
>         gforth@gnu.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gforth
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         gforth-request@gnu.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         gforth-owner@gnu.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Gforth digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Why hasn't gforth made it to 1.0 ... yet? (John Chludzinski)
>    2. Re: Why hasn't gforth made it to 1.0 ... yet? (Bernd Paysan)
>    3. Re: Why hasn't gforth made it to 1.0 ... yet? (Anton Ertl)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 02:41:51 -0400
> From: John Chludzinski <john.chludzinski@gmail.com>
> To: gforth@gnu.org
> Subject: Why hasn't gforth made it to 1.0 ... yet?
> Message-ID:
>         <CABftzejFaGabd+MLfOcR-OLq88Ckc=
> ahofOyYMnP7n1RSdPAsg@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> I just installed it on Raspbian-64 and got:
>
>
> *jski@raspberrypi ~> gforth --versiongforth 0.7.3*
>
> Gforth is what 20 years old?
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 14:49:08 +0200
> From: Bernd Paysan <bernd@net2o.de>
> To: gforth@gnu.org
> Cc: John Chludzinski <john.chludzinski@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Why hasn't gforth made it to 1.0 ... yet?
> Message-ID: <12009030.O9o76ZdvQC@liubei>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Am Mittwoch, 29. Juni 2022, 08:41:51 CEST schrieb John Chludzinski:
> > I just installed it on Raspbian-64 and got:
> >
> >
> > *jski@raspberrypi ~> gforth --versiongforth 0.7.3*
> >
> > Gforth is what 20 years old?
>
> You can install the snapshot that will become soon 1.0 from here:
>
> https://gforth.org/
>
> Debian
> Depending on your distribution use oldstable, stable or unstable instead
> of
> testing. Reason: broken libc.
> Obtain the key: wget -O - https://net2o.de/bernd@net2o.de-yubikey.pgp.asc
> |
> apt-key add -
> deb [arch=i386,amd64,armhf,armel,arm64,powerpc,mips,mipsel,all] https://
> net2o.de/debian testing main
>
> The 0.x didn't mean “it's not ready“.   We just started counting with 0,
> not
> with 1.
>
> --
> Bernd Paysan
> "If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself"
> net2o id: kQusJzA;7*?t=uy@X}1GWr!+0qqp_Cn176t4(dQ*
> https://net2o.de/
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 833 bytes
> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
> URL: <
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gforth/attachments/20220629/53f95052/attachment.sig
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 16:31:11 +0200
> From: Anton Ertl <anton@a4.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
> To: John Chludzinski <john.chludzinski@gmail.com>
> Cc: gforth@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Why hasn't gforth made it to 1.0 ... yet?
> Message-ID: <YrxiL+cd4Cc1eHe6@a4.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 02:41:51AM -0400, John Chludzinski wrote:
> > I just installed it on Raspbian-64 and got:
> >
> >
> > *jski@raspberrypi ~> gforth --versiongforth 0.7.3*
> >
> > Gforth is what 20 years old?
>
> In July it will be 30 years since we started the project.
>
> If your question is: Why are we numbering Gforth the way we are:
> gforth-0.7 did not have the features we wanted for 1.0.
>
> If your question is: Why is Gforth-1.0 (which is the next version) not
> out yet, the answer ist: Mostly because I have not found the time to
> complete the documentation.  If you want Gforth-1.0 that's not fully
> documented, the current snapshots (Bernd Paysan posted a way to get
> them) are pretty close to the what 1.0 will be.
>
> - anton
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gforth mailing list
> Gforth@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gforth
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Gforth Digest, Vol 110, Issue 2
> **************************************
>


-- 
Fitz
Cell: +1 (602) 803-7695
http://www.linkedin.com/in/fitzfitzpatrick


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]