[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Progress update on adjustment database
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Progress update on adjustment database |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Sep 2023 08:03:36 +0000 (UTC) |
> Is testing all these combinations really necessary?
I don't know :-) I just wanted to point out that feature combinations
have to be considered.
> [...] My intuition says very few of these combinations actually
> matter.
Yes, I agree.
> I wrote some pseudocode for a different approach that I believe
> accomplishes the same thing, while being more efficient and hopefully
> removing the need to constrain the set of features considered: [...]
Sounds good. Unfortunately, I'm a bit short of time right now; I'll
think about your algorithm within the next few days. However, please
proceed anyway!
> I attached some pictures of the tilde unflattening approaches.
Thanks. Do you have meanwhile found an explanation why o-tilde looks
so bad for Times New Roman at 16ppem?
> I chose sizes that showcase the differences between the approaches,
> and also committed my current code if you would like to try it
> yourself.
Will try if I find some time.
Werner
- Re: Progress update on adjustment database, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/09/02
- Re: Progress update on adjustment database, Craig White, 2023/09/11
- Re: Progress update on adjustment database, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/09/12
- Re: Progress update on adjustment database, Craig White, 2023/09/16
- Re: Progress update on adjustment database,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Progress update on adjustment database, Craig White, 2023/09/26
- Re: Progress update on adjustment database, Craig White, 2023/09/27
- Re: Progress update on adjustment database, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/09/30
- Re: Progress update on adjustment database, Craig White, 2023/09/30