[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: -warmup
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: -warmup |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Aug 2023 05:38:57 +0000 (UTC) |
>> I still think that for such cases the number of iterations of the
>> affected tests should be increased to get more precise values.
>
> the times are for single iteration. (chunk median/chunk size)
Yes, but the number of iterations is the same regardless whether a
test takes 10µs or 1000µs – I suspect that it is necessary to either
increase the number of iterations for the former case or to do bulk
tests. With 'bulk test' I mean that you don't time single iterations
but do timings for 10 iterations in a group, say, thus avoiding issues
with the granularity of the OS timing functions.
I refuse to believe that we have to live with timing differences of
more than 50%.
BTW, have you checked whether replacing `CLOCK_REALTIME` with
`CLOCK_MONOTONIC` gives better results?
What platform do you actually develop on? What #if clause in
function `get_time` of `ftbench.c` is run on your computer?
Werner
- Re: -warmup, (continued)
- Re: -warmup, Ahmet Göksu, 2023/08/18
- Re: -warmup, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/08/21
- Re: -warmup, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/08/28
- Re: -warmup, Ahmet Göksu, 2023/08/29
- Re: -warmup, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/08/29
- Re: -warmup, Ahmet Göksu, 2023/08/29
- Re: -warmup,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: -warmup, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/08/30